A New Era of Monarchical Rule in America?
On the historic date of September 17, 1787, as Benjamin Franklin exited the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia, he was approached by Elizabeth Willing Powel who inquired whether the United States would be a republic or a monarchy. Franklin famously responded, “A republic, if you can keep it.” This interaction underscores the fragile nature of democracy.
Fast forward to November 5, 2024, a pivotal moment when the United States, it seems, edged closer to monarchy. The electorate has chosen a leader with authoritarian tendencies. This isn’t hyperbole. Consider the actions and statements of Donald Trump. In July 2019, he boldly claimed, “With Article II, I can do whatever I want as president.” His tenure was marked by numerous violations of federal laws and constitutional provisions, often blatantly and without consequence. His administration was characterized by obstruction of justice and defiance against over 125 congressional subpoenas. Trump has managed to evade legal repercussions, thanks to a team of lawyers adept at stalling the judicial process despite several indictments and negative civil judgments.
Trump’s admiration for authoritarian leaders is well-documented, and his meetings with such figures have been conducted with pride. He appears poised to surround himself with loyalists who share his dictatorial ambitions, aiming to take control of federal agencies and departments. The Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025 has laid out a 900-page plan for a corporate state that embodies American fascism. Trump and his allies have compiled lists of adversaries, signaling a troubling road ahead.
Anticipate Turmoil and Authoritarianism Come January
Trump, along with figures like JD Vance, speaks of wielding considerable power after January 20, 2025, and their confidence isn’t misplaced. They will have the backing of a compliant Republican majority in both the House and the Senate. A recent Supreme Court ruling, influenced by three Trump-appointed justices, declared that a president’s official actions, regardless of their extremity, are immune from criminal prosecution. Trump fully expects his presidency to operate above the law, unchallenged, with ordinary citizens lacking the legal standing to sue. He plans to appoint a new Attorney General and replace federal prosecutors at the Department of Justice.
Despite Trump’s questionable grasp on facts and policies—traits he himself has mocked in others by calling them “dumb as a rock” or “low IQ”—he has proven adept at manipulating public opinion and the media. He dismisses severe climate events as hoaxes and promotes aggressive fossil fuel extraction with slogans like “drill baby drill.”
Trump constructs a narrative of false achievements and failures, continually asserting that “Only I can fix it.” His lies serve as entertainment for his followers, who see him as a champion of their grievances. He promises a utopian America in his next term without a realistic plan.
His attacks on the media, branding them as “fake news” and targeting outlets like the New York Times, paradoxically ensure he remains a constant presence in the news cycle, often highlighted with the derisive nicknames he coins for his critics.
Although major newspapers have reported extensively on Trump’s various misdeeds—ranging from personal misconduct to financial improprieties—these revelations have largely failed to diminish his appeal among his base. The resilience of his Teflon-coated image shows a disheartening reflection of voter sentiment.
Trump’s electoral success also owes to the ineffectiveness of the Democratic Party, which has struggled with internal issues and failed to capitalize on or learn from past errors. Trump has masterfully exploited these weaknesses, particularly during the lackluster Harris campaign, feeding his audience a steady diet of untruths and provocative promises while openly scorning the establishment.
The American political system, which stifles third-party and independent candidates, contributes to a lack of true democratic competition, as detailed in Theresa Amato’s Grand Illusion: The Myth of Voter Choice in a Two-Party Tyranny. Despite this, most voters still prefer to back what they perceive as the likely winner, often resigning themselves to the limited choices presented by the two-party system.
As 2025 approaches, expect an escalation in chaos, vendettas, greed, and the unchecked rise of corrupt plutocrats and oligarchs, spearheaded by figures like Elon Musk. This marks a shift towards a regime that could mirror historical fascist states, fulfilling the worst fears of America’s founding fathers who designed the Constitution to prevent the rise of a tyrant akin to King George III. These safeguards are in danger of being dismantled, signaling a potentially grim future for American governance.
Similar Posts
- Confirmed: Donald Trump Clinched the 2020 Presidential Victory
- Trump Proposes 100% Tax on Foreign Films: What It Means for Hollywood!
- Mass Protests Set Against Trump’s Birthday Military Parade: ‘We Don’t Do Kings’!
- Trump Drops Lawsuits Against Top Donors to His Inauguration: Find Out Why!
- Trump Pardons Jan. 6 Rioters, Fuels Political Violence!
An economic reporter, Dax Everly breaks down financial trends and their impact on Americans’ daily lives.